Parwez Alam @ Md. Parwez v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ss. 3(5), 329(3), 351(2), 352
- Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 ss. 8, 12
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Considering the period of custody, this application is allowed.
Judgment
The State of Bihar Zarina Khatoon wife of Md. Hafiz Resident of village- Lavkund Manlhawli Ward No 11, PS -Muffasil, Dist -Purnea ... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the State ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR Mr.Manoj Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr.Bishweshwar Ram, APP : : 4 08-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned APP ORAL ORDER for the State and learned counsel for the informant.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 14 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 329(3), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act.
As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is said to have entered the house of the informant and have misbehaved with the daughter of the informant.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34149 of 2025(4) dt.08-10-2025 case. The petitioner is in custody since 20.02.2025.
Learned counsel for the informant submits that the parties have settled their disputes and the trial is on the verge of conclusion.
Considering the period of custody, this application is allowed.
Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned DASJ-6th-cum-Speclial Judge (POCSO), Purnea/ concerned Court in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 14 of 2025. (Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.