Dharni Sahani v. The State Of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail granted
of liquor, this application for regular bail is allowed
Provisions considered
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act s. 30(a)
Judgment
Operative part
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP ORAL ORDER 2 16-10-2023 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 639 of 2020 registered for the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. Recovery is of 60 litres of illicit liquor. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 24.07.2023 and has 8 criminal antecedents. Considering the period of custody and the recovery of liquor, this application for regular bail is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66846 of 2023(2) dt.16-10-2023 learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No.-I, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 639 of 2020. The petitioner will visit Sugauli Police Station on the first Sunday of each month. Any default in appearance at the Police Station would result in cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Guddu/- U T
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: of liquor, this application for regular bail is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act — s. 30(a).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.