Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita — Section 480
(1) When any person accused of, or suspected of, the commission of any
480. (1) When any person accused of, or suspected of, the commission of any non-bailable offence is arrested or detained without warrant by an officer in charge of a police station or appears or is brought before a Court other than the High Court or Court of Session, he may be released on bail, but—
(i) such person shall not be so released if there appear reasonable grounds for
This Bare Act is a government source available in the public domain. It is being used strictly for educational purposes only.
Sec. 1] 145 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ 145
believing that he has been guilty of an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life;
(ii) such person shall not be so released if such offence is a cognizable offence and he had been previously convicted of an offence punishable with death, imprisonment for life or imprisonment for seven years or more, or he had been previously convicted on two or more occasions of a cognizable offence punishable with imprisonment for three years or more but less than seven years:
Provided that the Court may direct that a person referred to in clause (i) or clause (ii)
be released on bail if such person is a child or is a woman or is sick or infirm:
Provided further that the Court may also direct that a person referred to in clause (ii) be released on bail if it is satisfied that it is just and proper so to do for any other special reason:
Provided also that the mere fact that an accused person may be required for being identified by witnesses during investigation or for police custody beyond the first fifteen days shall not be sufficient ground for refusing to grant bail if he is otherwise entitled to be released on bail and gives an undertaking that he shall comply with such directions as may be given by the Court:
Provided also that no person shall, if the offence alleged to have been committed by him is punishable with death, imprisonment for life, or imprisonment for seven years or more, be released on bail by the Court under this sub-section without giving an opportunity of hearing to the Public Prosecutor.
(2) If it appears to such officer or Court at any stage of the investigation, inquiry or trial, as the case may be, that there are not reasonable grounds for believing that the accused has committed a non-bailable offence, but that there are sufficient grounds for further inquiry into his guilt, the accused shall, subject to the provisions of section 492 and pending such inquiry, be released on bail, or, at the discretion of such officer or Court, o the execution by him of a bond for his appearance as hereinafter provided. n
(3) When a person accused or suspected of the commission of an offence punishable with imprisonment which may extend to seven years or more or of an offence under Chapter VI, Chapter VII or Chapter XVII of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 or abetment of, or conspiracy or attempt to commit, any such offence, is released on bail under sub-section (1), the Court shall impose the conditions,—
(a) that such person shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond
executed under this Chapter;
(b) that such person shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which
he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; and
(c) that such person shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence,
and may also impose, in the interests of justice, such other conditions as it considers necessary.
(4) An officer or a Court releasing any person on bail under sub-section (1) or
sub-section (2), shall record in writing his or its reasons or special reasons for so doing.
(5) Any Court which has released a person on bail under sub-section (1) or sub-section (2), may, if it considers it necessary so to do, direct that such person be arrested and commit him to custody.
This Bare Act is a government source available in the public domain. It is being used strictly for educational purposes only.
146 [Part II— THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ 146
(6) If, in any case triable by a Magistrate, the trial of a person accused of any non-bailable offence is not concluded within a period of sixty days from the first date fixed for taking evidence in the case, such person shall, if he is in custody during the whole of the said period, be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Magistrate, unless for reasons to be recorded in writing, the Magistrate otherwise directs.
(7) If, at any time, after the conclusion of the trial of a person accused of a non-bailable offence and before judgment is delivered, the Court is of opinion that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty of any such offence, it shall release the accused, if he is in custody, on the execution by him of a bond for his appearance to hear judgment delivered.
Bail to require accused to appear before next Appellate Court.
Follow cited cases · Browse courts and years · Research topics
Judgments citing Section 480
- Satnam v. Chirag Malik
- State of Punjab v. Mr. Manjinder S. Bhullar, DAG, Punjab
- Jaspreet Kaur alias Preeti v. Mr. Anup Singh, AAG, Punjab
- Balvinder State of Haryana & Anr. v. CRA-S
- Shuvendu Saha v. The State of West Bengal & Anr.
- SMT ANUSYA K R v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
- SMT. KAMALA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
- Punjab And Haryana High Court · 2026
- SMT. LALITHA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ANEKAL POLICE, ANEKAL
- RIYA DEBNATH v. STATE BY RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR
- SMT RANJITHA H v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
- SMT. MEENA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
- RIHANA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
- RIHANA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
- TAYAMMA v. Court of Karnataka
- SMT. CHAITHRA v. STATE BY KADUGODI P.S
Text reproduced from the public statutes on which the corpus is built. Verify against the official Gazette before relying on it. This is statute reference, not legal advice.