✦ Karnataka High Court

MANJUNATH v. THE STATE BY SAMPIGEHALLI POLICE STATION

Case at a glance

Outcome

Allowed

The Criminal Petition is allowed

Key paragraphs

  • Para 66. It is not in dispute that the petitioners herein do not have any criminal antecedents. Investigation of the case is now completed and charge sheet has been filed. Accused Nos.3 to 5 are married ladies, who are in custody from 06.05.2026 onwards. Considering the…

Judgment

(BY SRI. MOHAMMED PASHA C, ADVOCATE) …PETITIONERS HC-KAR - 2 - NC: 2026:KHC:41519 CRL.P No. 8924 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 9134 of 2026 CNR: KAHC010419812026 AND:

#1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY SAMPIGEHALLI PS, REP. BY SPP, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001.

#2. SMT. MAHADEVI AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC: POLICE SUB INSPECTOR, SAMPIGEHALLI POLICE STATION, R.K. HEGDE NAGAR, BENGALURU CITY, KARNATAKA - 560 077. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. RASHMI PATEL, ASPP FOR R1; SRI. SADEED MOHAMMED, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.439 (FILED U/S.483 BNSS) OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS BAIL APPLICATION AND ENLARGE THEM ON REGULAR BAIL IN VIDE CRIME NO.151/2026 REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 (SAMPIGEHALLI P.S,) FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE 143(4), 64, 3(5) OF BNS 2023 U/S.4 OF POCSO ACT 2012 AND U/S.3, 4, 5 AND 6 OF ITP ACT 1956 WHICH IS PENDING BEFORE THE HONBLE COURT OF ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, FTSC IV AT BENGALURU AGAINST THE PETITIONER. IN CRL.P NO. 9134/2026 BETWEEN: MANJUNATH S/O THIMMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT HUSKUR, DODDABELAVANGALA HOBLI, DODDABALLAPUR TALUK, HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010419812026 - 3 - NC: 2026:KHC:41519 CRL.P No. 8924 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 9134 of 2026 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 561 203. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. DINESHKUMAR RAO K, ADVOCATE) AND:

#1. THE STATE BY SAMPIGEHALLI POLICE STATION, BENGALURU - 560 077.

#2. SMT. MAHADEVI AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC: POLICE OFFICER, R/AT PSI, SAMPIGEHALLI POLICE STATION, RK HEGADE NAGAR, BENGALURU CITY - 560 077 REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. RASHMI JADHAV, ASPP FO R1; SRI. SADEED MOHAMMED, ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 438 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 482 BNNS) PRAYING TO ENLARGE PETITIONER ON ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN THE EVENT OF HIS ARREST IN CRIME NO.151/2026 OF SAMPIGEHALLI POLICE STATION, BENGALURU (REGISTERED FOR OFFENCES P/U/S 143(4), 64 AND 3(5) OF TE BNS 2023 AND U/S 4 OF POCSO ACT AND U/S 3, 4, 5 AND 6 OF IMMORAL TRAFFIC PREVENTION OF ACT 1956) AND THE SAME IS PENDING ON THE FILE OF FAST TRACK SPECIAL COURT-4 BENGALURU CITY. HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010419812026 - 4 - NC: 2026:KHC:41519 CRL.P No. 8924 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 9134 of 2026 THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY ORAL ORDER Accused Nos.3 to 6 in Crime No.151 of 2026 registered by Sampigehalli Police Station, Bengaluru City for the offences punishable under Section 143(4), 64 and 3(5) of BNS, 2023, Sections 4 of POCSO Act, 2012 and Section 3, 4, 5 and 6 of ITP Act, 1956, are before this Court in these two petitions filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 and 482 of BNSS, 2023 seeking regular bail and anticipatory bail.

#2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

#3. FIR in Crime No.151 of 2026 was registered by Sampigehalli Police Station, Bengaluru City for the aforesaid offences against Ameena Khan and others, based on the first information dated 06.05.2026 received from Smt. Mahadevi, Police Officer attached HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010419812026 - 5 - NC: 2026:KHC:41519 CRL.P No. 8924 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 9134 of 2026 Sampigehalli Police Station. In the said case, accused Nos.3 to 5 were arrested on 06.05.2026 and subsequently, remanded to judicial custody. Their bail application filed before jurisdictional Sessions Court Crl. Misc.No.4723 of 2026 was rejected on 11.06.2026. Therefore, they are before this Court in Crl.P.No.8924 of

#2026. Apprehending arrest in the case, accused No.6 had filed Crl. Misc.No.4670 of 2026, which was rejected by the jurisdictional Sessions Court on 11.06.2026. Therefore, he is before this Court in Crl.P.No.9134 of 2026.

#4. Material on record would go to show that based on credible information received by the first informant at about 13.20 hours on 06.05.2026 when she was present at the police station, to the effect that accused Nos.1 to 5 named in the FIR were indulged in running the illegal business of prostitution in a house situated within the jurisdiction of Sampigehalli Police Station, FIR was registered against the said five accused for the aforesaid offences. In the raid which was subsequently conducted to HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010419812026 - 6 - NC: 2026:KHC:41519 CRL.P No. 8924 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 9134 of 2026 the said house, accused Nos.1 to 5 were apprehended and CW.4 to CW.7, who are said to be minor victim girls were rescued. Accused No.6 is said to be a customer, who had visited the house in which accused Nos.1 to 5 were carrying on the illegal business of prostitution and had sexual intercourse with the rescued victims.

#5. FIR in the present case has been registered based on credible information even prior to the raid being conducted to the house in which accused Nos.1 to 5 were allegedly running the business of prostitution. The FIR has been registered in the present case by invoking the offence punishable under Section 4 of the POCSO Act, even before the trial was conducted. Therefore, a strong suspicion arises with regard to the genuineness of the FIR. The rescued victim CW.4 is said to be the daughter of accused No.1 and CW.5 is said to be the daughter of accused No.3. The other two alleged victims are the close relatives of the accused Nos.1 to 5. In the statement of the alleged victims, which was recorded under Section 183 HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010419812026 - 7 - NC: 2026:KHC:41519 CRL.P No. 8924 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 9134 of 2026 of BNSS, 2023, before the Court of jurisdictional Magistrate, they have not made an allegation which would attract the alleged offences against the accused. On the other hand, the alleged victims have clearly stated that the police had unnecessarily arrested accused Nos.1 to 5 and also had brought them to the police station.

#6. It is not in dispute that the petitioners herein do not have any criminal antecedents. Investigation of the case is now completed and charge sheet has been filed. Accused Nos.3 to 5 are married ladies, who are in custody from 06.05.2026 onwards. Considering the aforesaid aspects of the matter and also having regard to the proviso to Section 480 of BNSS, 2023, I am of the opinion that the prayer made by accused Nos.3 to 5 and also the prayer made by accused No.6, who is said to be a customer, for grant of bail needs to be allowed. Accordingly the following: HC-KAR - 8 - NC: 2026:KHC:41519 CRL.P No. 8924 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 9134 of 2026 CNR: KAHC010419812026 IN CRL.P.NO.8924/2026 O R D E R The Criminal Petition is allowed. The petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail in Crime No.151 of 2026 registered by Sampigehalli Police Station, Bengaluru City for the offences punishable under Section 143(4), 64 and 3(5) of BNS, 2023, Sections 4 of POCSO Act, 2012 and Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 of ITP Act, 1956, subject to the following conditions: a) The petitioners shall execute personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- each with two sureties for the likesum, to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court; b) The petitioners shall appear regularly on all the dates of hearing before the Trial Court unless the Trial Court exempts their appearance for valid reasons; c) The petitioners shall not directly or indirectly threaten or tamper with the prosecution witnesses; HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010419812026 - 9 - NC: 2026:KHC:41519 CRL.P No. 8924 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 9134 of 2026 d) The petitioners shall not involve in similar offences in future; IN CRL.P.NO.9134/2026 The criminal petition is allowed. The respondent - Police or any other police in the State of Karnataka are directed to release the petitioner in the event of his arrest in Crime No.151 of 2026 registered by Sampigehalli Police Station, Bengaluru City for the offences punishable under Section 143(4), 64 and 3(5) of BNS, 2023, Sections 4 of POCSO Act, 2012 and Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 of ITP Act, 1956, subject to the following conditions: a) Petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer within 15 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order and shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties for the likesum satisfaction investigating officer. b) Petitioner shall regularly appear before the Trial Court without fail unless HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010419812026 - 10 - NC: 2026:KHC:41519 CRL.P No. 8924 of 2026 C/W CRL.P No. 9134 of 2026 exempted by the Trial Court for valid reasons. c) Petitioner shall not tamper with the prosecution witness and he shall co-operate with the police for investigation and appear before them whenever called upon. d) Petitioner shall not involve in similar offences in future. Sd/- (S VISHWAJITH SHETTY) JUDGE AMM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 50

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The Criminal Petition is allowed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — ss. 480, 483; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438; Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — ss. 3(5), 64, 143(4); Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — s. 4; ITP Act, 1956 — ss. 3, 4, 5, 6.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Karnataka High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Criminal Petition No. 8924 of 2026). ← Search more judgments