Bapi Ghosh v. State of West Bengal & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 ss. 67(1), 68(3), 68(3)(c), 71(3)(a), 88, 88(1), 88(4)
- Constitution of India art. 19(1)(g)
Key paragraphs
- Para 2020. The writ petition Nos. WPA 19267 of 2024 with WPA 19269 of 2024 with WPA 19270 of 2024 with WPA 19271 of 2024 with WPA 19274 of 2024 are allowed with the following direction: (i) the respondent/RTA, Birbhum is directed to immediately grant countersignature…
Judgment
#20. The writ petition Nos. WPA 19267 of 2024 with WPA 19269 of 2024 with WPA 19270 of 2024 with WPA 19271 of 2024 with WPA 19274 of 2024 are allowed with the following direction: (i) the respondent/RTA, Birbhum is directed to immediately grant countersignature as to the extension of route under the permit of the writ petitioners, maximum within a period of two weeks from the date of communication of this order
#21. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon compliance of necessary formalities. (Rai Chattopadhyay, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — ss. 67(1), 68(3), 68(3)(c), 71(3)(a), 88, 88(1), 88(4); Constitution of India — art. 19(1)(g).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Calcutta High Court, on 23 Dec 2024.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.