✦ Allahabad High Court

Vice Chancellor Chandra Shekhar Azad University v. Ram Lakhan Singh And 2 Others

ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW SPECIAL APPEAL No. 409 of 2025RAJAN ROY, SUBHASH VIDYARTHI

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

The appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous

Key paragraphs

  • Para 22. The appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. November 24, 2025 Arnima (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) ARNIMA SINGH ARNIMA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Lucknow Bench
Read the judgmentGo to the operative partFind similar cases

Judgment

1.

Learned counsel for the appellant states that writ petition, in which the interim order was passed and which was assailed before us, has itself been decided finally, therefore, the counsel states that the appeal has become infructuous.

Operative part

2.

The appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. November 24, 2025 Arnima (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) ARNIMA SINGH ARNIMA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Lucknow Bench

Find similar cases Start drafting free

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Related cases why they’re linked — not procedural history

Why is this linked?

Continue researching

Connect this judgment to its cited authorities, statutes, and related legal questions.

Follow cited cases Browse research topics Explore statutes & sections
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW SPECIAL APPEAL No. 409 of 2025). ← Search more judgments