✦ Allahabad High Court

Smt.Padmavati Pandey v. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2

ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. 9031 of 2025SANGEETA CHANDRA, BRIJ RAJ SINGH

Case at a glance

Bench
SANGEETA CHANDRA, BRIJ RAJ SINGH

Outcome

Disposed of

This writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail

Provisions considered

Judgment

It is the case of the petitioner in Writ C No.5702 of 2025 [Smt. Padmavati Pandey vs. State of U.P. & Others] where this Court has noted her greivance of discharge of sewage of water in the agricultural holding of the petitioner. The Court had disposed of the matter by observing that the Executive Officer, Municipality Bhinga, District Shrawasti may look into the matter and take needful steps in this regard in accordance with law. It has been submitted that till date nothing has been done, hence, this petition has been filed. Learned counsel for Municipality, Bhinga has on the basis of written instructions submits that after such order was passed by this Court on

Operative part

07.07.2025 the petitioner made a representation which has been rejected as it was found after inspection that no sewage water was being 2 WRIC No. 9031 of 2025 discharged by the Municipality in the agricultural holding of the petitioner. A copy of the order passed by the Executive Officer has been handed over to the counsel for the petitioner today in the Court. This writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy available under law. September 17, 2025 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) MANISH SAXENA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: This writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Allahabad High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. 9031 of 2025). ← Search more judgments