Smt. Sushma And 2 Others v. State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 07 May 2025
- Neutral citation
- 2025:AHC:73294-DB
Provisions considered
Judgment
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 14387 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Sushma And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suman Kumar Yadav, Swapnil Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pradeep Chauhan Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the respondent-Nagar Palika Parishad. Challenge in the writ petition is to a notice issued to the petitioner on 01.04.2025 calling upon the petitioner to remove his unauthorized construction failing which proceedings under the U.P. Municipalities Act 1916 shall be drawn against him. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that a detailed reply has been submitted by the petitioner to this notice on 14.04.2025. Counsel appearing for the respondent has stated that no such reply is available in the record of the respondent. The petition is also silent as to the manner in which this reply was furnished to the respondents. Be that as it may, the objection of the petitioner is appended with the writ petition as Annexure No.3. The petition under the circumstances is disposed of directing the respondent to consider also this reply filed by the petitioner before proceedings any further in the matter. Order Date :- 7.5.2025 Himanshu
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 07 May 2025.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.