2025 Sebu State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko v. State of U.P. had directed that & Ors.

the trial Court to allow the applicant to submit only a personal bond and two sureties in lieu of two cases, mentioned in the instant application.

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in six cases, details of which are as under: (i). Case Crime No. 459/2025, under Section 2/3(1) U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Gosainganj, District Sultanpur; (ii). Case Crime No. 281/2025, under Section 3/5A/8, U.P. Cow Slaughter Act, Police Station Gosainganj, District Sultanpur.

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant belongs to a very poor family so he is unable to manage 4 persons for surety before the learned trial court.

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in special leave to appeal Criminal No.8914- 8915 of 2018 Hani Nishad alias Mohd. Imran alias Viccky vs. State of U.P. and Others had directed that the applicant who was an accused in 31 cases be released on bail taking one personal bond and two 2 NA528 No. 1900 of 2025 sureties.

A prayer has been made by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant be also given the benefit of judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hani Nishad (supra).

This application is disposed of with the direction to the learned trial court to accept one personal bond and two sureties to its satisfaction in one criminal case against the applicant and such personal bond and sureties shall hold good in the other case also in which the applicant has been granted bail. November 21, 2025 A.Nigam (Brij Raj Singh,J.) ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench