Charan Jeet Singh v. Revisional Authority U.P. Urban Planning
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 31 Jul 2025
- Bench
- PANKA
- Neutral citation
- 2025:AHC-LKO:44442
Provisions considered
Judgment
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner.
The present petition has been filed with the following prayer: "i. to issue an Order or Direction commanding the opposite party no.1 to expeditiously decide the statutory Revision under Section 41(3) of the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 preferred on 11/07/2025 received in the Office of the Principal Secretary, Housing and Urban Planning on 15/07/2025 within the time frame as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court; ii. to issue an Order or Direction commanding the opposite party no.1 to expeditiously decide the application for interim relief within the time frame as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court,"
Considering the fact that the petitioner has filed a revision along with an interim relief application, the present petition is disposed off directing the revisional court to pass order on the interim relief application filed along with the revision with all expedition preferably within a period of three weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.
For a period of three weeks or till disposal of the interim relief application by the revisional authority, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner.
This order has been passed in the presence of Ms. Shraddha Agarwal, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of respondents no.2, 3 and 4. The Vakalatnama is taken on record. Order Date :- 31.7.2025 akverma ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 — s. 41(3).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 31 Jul 2025. The bench was PANKA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.