Jai Prakash v. State Of U.P. And 4 Others
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with direction to the
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with direction to the respondent no. 2 to decide the revision dated 10.02.2024 by speaking order within twelve weeks from the date of communication of the instant order along with photocopy of the revision. (Anish Kumar Gupta, J.)…
Judgment
Learned counsel for the petitioner has pressed only relief no.1, which is for a direction to the respondent no. 2 to decide the petitioner's revision dated 10.02.2024 under Section 41(3) of the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 read with Section 12 of the U.P. Industrial Area Development Act, 1976 within a stipulated time frame.
Learned Standing Counsel and learned counsel for the respondent Development Authority do not oppose the prayer.
Operative part
Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with direction to the respondent no. 2 to decide the revision dated 10.02.2024 by speaking order within twelve weeks from the date of communication of the instant order along with photocopy of the revision. (Anish Kumar Gupta, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Order Date :- 31.1.2025
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with direction to the
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 — s. 41(3); U.P. Industrial Area Development Act, 1976 — s. 12.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 31 Jan 2025. The bench was MANO, ANISH KUMAR GUPTA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.