Dr. R.N.Jaiswal v. Small Causes Court/ Prescribed Authority Lko.And 2 Ors
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
repealed, the present petition is disposed off quashing the order
Provisions considered
Judgment
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The present writ petition has been filed challenging an order dated 28.08.2000 whereby the application under Section 21(1) (a) of U.P. Act No.13 of 1972 has been rejected as well as appellate order dated 18.08.2007 whereby the original order has been confirmed.
Learned counsel for the respondent is also present and states that the Rent Control Act has been repealed by means of U.P. Regulation of Urban Premises Tenancy Act, 2021, in which proceedings can be initiated by the land lord for eviction irrespective of rent under Section 21.
Operative part
In view of the fact that the Rent Control Act, 1972 has been repealed, the present petition is disposed off quashing the order dated 28.08.2000 & 18.08.2007 and permitting the landlord to file a fresh application under the Tenancy Act, 2021. In case, such an application is filed, the same shall be decided within a period of three months of it being filed as mandated under the Act itself, in accordance with law.
It is further provided that while dealing with fresh proceedings, the effect of both the orders shall not be taken into consideration by the authority concerned. Order Date :- 1.5.2025 nishant NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: repealed, the present petition is disposed off quashing the order
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Rent Control Act; Urban Premises Tenancy Act, 2021; Rent Control Act, 1972; Tenancy Act, 2021.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 01 May 2025. The bench was PANKA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.