Imran v. Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, this petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose will be served in keeping this petition pending. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the opposite Party No.1/Addl. Commissioner (Judicial) Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya to decide the Revision No.202/2012-13, Computerized Case No.C-2013040000883 (Moinuddin Versus Shah Sikandar) including the application dated 20.2.2025/4.3.2025 for abatement moved by the petitioner, most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party preferably within a period of six months from the next date fixed in the case. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 6.5.2025 ML/- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, this petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Uttar Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1901 — s. 209.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Allahabad High Court, on 06 May 2025. The bench was SAURABH LAVANIA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.