Smt. Poonam Chaudhary v. Sunil Kumar Singh
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The application is disposed of
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. The appeal is disposed of. (Arindam Sinha,J.) (Satya Veer Singh,J.) October 28, 2025 Shiraz
Judgment
Smt. Poonam Chaudhary Versus .....Appellant(s) .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) Counsel for Respondent(s) : : Sunil Kumar Singh Anil Kumar Court No. - 39 HON'BLE ARINDAM SINHA, J. HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J.
Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, learned advocate appears on behalf of applicant-appellant-husband. He submits, the joint petition for mutual divorce was dismissed by the Family Court on judgment dated 13th August, 2025. His client is aggrieved. On query he submits, prescribed period of separation was found as not achieved. On further query he submits, his client and respondent will join to again petition for mutual divorce because by this time more than the prescribed period of separation has happened.
Mr. Anil Kumar, learned advocate appears on behalf of respondent-wife. He submits, above are the facts. His client is ready and willing to join and again petition for mutual divorce.
Operative part
We find the appeal was presented on reported delay of ten days. Parties are ad idem and want to again join to petition and as such we accept cause shown for the delay. It is condoned and the appeal admitted. The application is disposed of. Regular number be allotted.
Facts and circumstances do not warrant interference in appeal. However, as parties have continuing cause and are enabled by section 13-B in Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 to jointly petition for mutual divorce, now that they have achieved the prescribed period of separation, they may do so. 2 FAPLD No. 1137 of 2025
The appeal is disposed of. (Arindam Sinha,J.) (Satya Veer Singh,J.) October 28, 2025 Shiraz
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The application is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.