(Through Hybrid mode) v. Commissioner-Cum-Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Bhubaneswar & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The writ petition is disposed of
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. The writ petition is disposed of. (Arindam Sinha) Judge RKS
Judgment
Mr. Kishor Chandra Pradhan, Advocate -Versus- Commissioner-Cum-Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Bhubaneswar and others …. Opposite Parties Mr. A. K. Nanda, Addl. Govt. Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA Order No. ORDER 14.12.2022
Mr. Pradhan, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioners and submits, his clients are presently in charge of affairs of the Gram Panchayat Level Federation (GPLF) Committee. Private opposite party no.5 is to be directed to handover necessary files to his clients. His clients made representation dated 19th September, 2022 to said opposite party. There be direction for consideration of representation.
Mr. Nanda, learned advocate, Additional Government Advocate appears on behalf of State and submits, the representation will be duly dealt with.
Opposite party no.5 is directed to consider and deal with said representation dated 19th September, 2022 and either handover the documents and records of the Committee to petitioners or inform them as to why it cannot be done. Either way petitioners must be told within three weeks of communication.
Operative part
The writ petition is disposed of. (Arindam Sinha) Judge RKS
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.