Mohammad Zahid v. State Of U.P. And 5 Others
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The writ petition is disposed of
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. In the event, the petitioner is of the view that the cause of action still survives, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file an application for recall/variation/modification of this order in accordance with law. August 22, 2025 Dev (Praveen Kumar Giri,J.) (Shekhar B.…
Judgment
: Abhishek Srivastava, Aditya Swaroop Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : B P Mishra, Brijesh Pratap Mishra, C.S.C., Shailendra Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J.
The present writ petition has been appearing in the Warning List under the heading "Oldest Pending Cases in this High Court for Priority Hearing".
None appears on behalf of the petitioner even in the revised call.
Learned Standing Counsel appears on behalf of the State respondents.
Upon perusal of the record, it appears that no cause of action survives, and accordingly, the matter is consigned to record.
Operative part
The writ petition is disposed of.
In the event, the petitioner is of the view that the cause of action still survives, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file an application for recall/variation/modification of this order in accordance with law. August 22, 2025 Dev (Praveen Kumar Giri,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) DEV PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.