Smt.Rajjo Devi & Anr. v. U.O.I. Thru. G.M. Northern Railway New Delhi
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
The writ petition is disposed of
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. In the event, the petitioner(s) is of the view that the cause of action still survives, liberty is granted to the petitioner(s) to file an application for recall/variation/modification of this order in accordance with law. October 28, 2025 Anupam S/- (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B.…
Judgment
Smt. Rajjo Devi And Anr. Versus .....Petitioner(s) U.O.I. Thru. G.M. Northern Railway New Delhi And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anil Kumar Gupta, Smt. Ruchi Gupta : C.S.C., Arun Kumar Verma, Brijesh Kumar Shukla, Mrs. Suniti Sachan Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
The present writ petition has been appearing under the heading of "Priority Cases".
None appears on behalf of the petitioner(s) even in the revised call.
Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondent(s) and learned counsel for the respondent are present.
Upon perusal of the record, it appears that no cause of action survives, and accordingly, the matter is consigned to record.
Operative part
The writ petition is disposed of.
In the event, the petitioner(s) is of the view that the cause of action still survives, liberty is granted to the petitioner(s) to file an application for recall/variation/modification of this order in accordance with law. October 28, 2025 Anupam S/- (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.