ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION CO v. UNION OF INDIA
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE ADVANCE CONSTRUCTION CO VS UNION OF INDIA BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SHEKHAR B. SARAF Date : 28th April, 2022 Appearance: Mr. Nilanjan Bhattacharya, Adv. Mr. S.K. Tiwari, Adv. The Court: On perusal of the documents it is clear that there is an arbitration clause in the agreement. It also appears that the arbitration clause is in conflict with Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Accordingly, as per the Supreme Court judgments passed in TRF Limited v. Energo Engineering Projects Ltd. reported in (2017) 8 SCC 377 and in Perkins Eastman Architects v. HSCC (India) Limited reported in (2019) 9 SCC Online SC 1517, the Court is required to appoint an independent Arbitrator. In light of the same, Mr. Soumyajit Ghosh, Advocate (Mob. No.9830060597) is appointed as Arbitrator. The appointment is subject to submission of declaration by the Arbitrator in terms of Section 12(1) in the form prescribed in the Sixth 2 Schedule of the Act before the Registrar, Original Side of this Court within four weeks from today. Let this order be conveyed to the Arbitrator by the Registrar, Original Side forthwith. AP/161/2022 is accordingly disposed of. (SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.) R.Bhar
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 12(5).
Which court decided this case, and when?
Calcutta High Court, on 28 Apr 2022. The bench was SHEKHAR B SARAF.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.