Writ Petition No. 1102 (S/B) of 2002 v. Additional Registrar, Cooperative
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of finally
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner is that his services have been terminated from the post of Technical Officer, Kishan Sewa Sahkari Samiti Ltd., Bujurg, Lakser, Hardwar in the year 1995, against which he has moved a representation which ought to have been treated an application under Section 70 of the U.P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 and an arbitrator ought to have been appointed who could have decided the dispute raised by the petitioner. On account of inaction on the part of the respondents, the dispute raised by the petitioner has not been decided till date despite the order passed by the High Court prior to the appointed day. Considering the facts and circumstances, we direct that the dispute shall be referred to the Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Uttaranchal for action in accordance with the provisions of U.P. Cooperative Societies Act within fifteen days from the date of production of certified copy of this order. The arbitrator shall proceed with the matter and conclude the proceedings within a period of two months from the date of initiation of proceedings under Section 70 of the U.P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1995. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of finally. (Irshad Hussain,J.) (P.C. Verma,)
29.08.2002 P
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of finally
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
U.P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 — s. 70; U.P. Cooperative Societies Act; U.P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1995 — s. 70.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Uttarakhand High Court, on 29 Aug 2002. The bench was IRSHAD HUSSAIN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.