Ramesh Bandhu v. State of Uttaranchal
Case at a glance
- Bench
- B C KANDPAL
Provisions considered
- Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ss. 2, 13
Judgment
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Arising out of case crime No. 9 of 2005 U/Ss 7/13 (1) D read with Section 13/2 Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Police Station – Rajpur District – Dehradun. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon’ble B.C. Kandpal, J. The applicant has applied for bail in case crime no. 9 of 2005, U/Ss 7/13 (1) D read with Section 13/2 Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Police Station – Rajpur, District – Dehradun. Heard Sri Rakesh Thapliyal, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record. The applicant is in jail since 19.02.2005 and learned A.G.A. could not show any criminal history of the applicant before me. As per the allegation made by the complainant in his written report, it reveals that the bribe was in fact demanded by the Junior Engineer. The applicant is a Line Man and this fact has not been denied from the side of the prosecution. Having considered the aforesaid circumstances, I think it is just and proper to release the applicant on bail at this stage. Let the applicant, Ramesh Bandhu be released on bail on executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate concerned. April 19, 2005 Shiv (B.C. Kandpal, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.