C.B.I. BANK SECURITIES & FRAUD CELL v. RAMESH GELLI & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ss. 7, 12, 13
Judgment
s.13(2) rlw. s.13(l){d) - Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - s.46A - Separate Judgments of Hon 'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Gogoi, and Hon 'hie Mr. Justice Prafulla C. Pant reported in [2016] 1 SCR 762 - Para 25 of the Judgment of Hon 'ble Mr. Justice Prafulla C. Pant - D Modification made in the said para. CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Cr! MP Nos. 6416- 6420 of2016 in Criminal Appeal Nos. I 077-1081 of2013. E From the Judgment and Order dated 13.07.2009 of the High Court of Judicature at Mumbai in Criminal Revision Application No. 131 of 2007 with Criminal Writ Petition No. 2400 of2008 to 2403 of2008. Tushar Mehta, ASG, Rana Mukherjee, Sr. Adv., Ms. Ranjana Narayan, T. A. Khan, M.A. Meroria, Arvind Kumar Sharma, Advs. for the Appellant. F Mohan Parasaran, Sr. Adv., G. Umapathy, Rakesh K. Sharma, S. Ramasubramanian, Ranjit B. Raut, Ms. Bina Gupta, Abay A. Jena, Mis Khaitan & Co., Ad vs. for the Respondents. G H The Order of the Court was delivered ORDER Jn paragraph 25 of the Judgment dated 23.02.2016 (by Mr. Prafulla 870 C.B.I. BANK SECURITIES & FRAUD CELL v. RAMESH GELLI 871 & ORS. C. Pant, J.) instead of words "Section 46 of Banking Regulation Act, 1949" the words "Section 46A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949" shall be substituted and in th~ last sentence of the paragraph instead of "Section 7 to 13 of the P.C. Act, 1988", the words "Section 7 to 12 of the P.C. Act, 1988", shall be substituted. CRL.M.P. Nos. 6416-6420 of2016 are accordingly allowed. A B Nidhi Jain Petitions allowed.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.