WPCRL No. 904 of 2010 · Uttarakhand High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- PRAFULLA C PANT
Outcome
Dismissed
The writ petition is dismissed as
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 323, 498A, 504, 506
- Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961
Judgment
Operative part
None present for the petitioner. Smt. Mamta Bisht, A.G.A, present for the State. Ms. Neelima Mishra, Advocate, holding brief of Shri Ramji Srivastava Advocate, present for the respondent no.3. Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent no.2. Same be taken on record. Learned counsel for the State informs that after completion of investigation charge sheet has been filed against the petitioner Seema Kanojia. In view of above development, this writ petition seeking quashing of First Information Report registered as crime no. 20 of 2010, relating to offences punishable under section 498A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C, and one punishable under section ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Police Station Basant Vihar, District Dehradun, has become infructuous. The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order dated 25.10.2010, passed by this court stands automatically vacated. 09-06-2011 NP
(P.C.P., J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition is dismissed as
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 323, 498A, 504, 506; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.