WPCRL No. 523 of 2010 · Uttarakhand High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- PRAFULLA C PANT
Outcome
Dismissed
The writ petition is dismissed with the
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 226
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 498A, 506
- Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961
Judgment
Operative part
Shri S.K.Mandal, Advocate, present for the petitioner. Shri B.S. Parihar, Brief Holder, present for the State. Heard. By means of this writ petition moved under article 226 of Constitution of India the petitioner has sought quashing of the FIR no. 249 relating to offences punishable under section 498A, 506 IPC and one punishable under section ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, P.S. Kotwali, Civil Line, Roorkee, District Haridwar. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and after going through papers on record, this court is not inclined to interfere with the investigation of the case. The writ petition is dismissed with the observation that if the petitioner Rakesh Kumar surrenders before the court concerned his bail application shall be heard and disposed unreasonable delay. (Stay application no. 5315 of 2010 also stands dismissed). without (P.C.P.J) 04.08.2010
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition is dismissed with the
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 226; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 498A, 506; Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.