Lakshmi Mehata v. The Registrar, Dr. Sarvapalli Radhakrishanan
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction to
Judgment
Operative part
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. R.C. Joshi, for the petitioner. Mr. Shanker Singh on behalf of Mr. Sandeep Bhandawat, for the respondent No.1. Mr. J.P. Joshi, for the respondents No.2 & 3. BY THE COURT: ------ Heard learned counsel for the parties. The grievance of the petitioner has already been raised by the Gandhi Vidhya Mandir, Sardarshahar before the University while sending communication dated 22.02.2012, therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the University to decide the matter with regard to the admission of the petitioner afresh as narrated in the communication dated
22.02.2012 by the institution within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. It is made clear that in the event of rejection of grievance raised by the institution and University denies admission to the petitioner, then petitioner will be at liberty to file fresh writ petition. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS) J. AKC/- M/11
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction to
Which court decided this case, and when?
Rajasthan High Court, on 13 Apr 2012. The bench was GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.