Arvind Kumar Jain & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In view thereof, there is no ground to entertain the petition, and it stands dismissed. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- Mr. Umesh Narang, Advocate, and Mr. Chandra Sekhar, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Tanushree Gupta, DAG, Haryana TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a direction to the respondents to grant the benefit of full pension to the petitioners, who are retirees from Aided Colleges, on completion of twenty years of qualifying service as admissible to teachers in Government Colleges in terms of notification, dated 25.08.2014, under Rule 8(1) of the Haryana Civil Services (Revised Pension) Part-II Rules, 2009.
The issue already stands decided against the petitioners vide judgment, dated 09.12.2024, rendered by this Court in CWP-9029-2018 titled V.K. Sharma and others v. State of Haryana and another.
In view thereof, there is no ground to entertain the petition, and it stands dismissed. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE
10.02.2025 Payal PAYAL 2025.02.11 09:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable Yes/No Yes/No
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.