PUNJAB & Ors. v. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 23 Jul 2026
- Bench
- TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
Outcome
Allowed
For the reasons stated, the application is allowed
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Ordered accordingly. Ordered accordingly. case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the In officer concerned shall pay costs…
Judgment
Operative part
TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present:- Mr. A. P. S. Sandhu for the petitioner. Mr. A. P. S. Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Satjot Singh Chahal, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Satjot Singh Chahal, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Mr. Satjot Singh Chahal, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. Ms. Jyotnoor Kaur Sethi, Advocate Ms. Jyotnoor Kaur Sethi, Advocate Ms. Jyotnoor Kaur Sethi, Advocate for respondents no.2, 3, 5 and 6. for respondents no.2 Mr. Anshul Jain, Advocate Mr. Anshul Jain, Advocate for respondent no.4. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA CM-12253-CWP CWP-2026 Additional For the reasons stated, the application is allowed. Additional For the reasons stated, the application is allowed. For the reasons stated, the application is allowed. affidavit and Annexure P taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. and Annexure P-7 are taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. Main Case The petition has been filed, inter alia The petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking a writ of , seeking a writ of mandamus directing Executive Engineer, Punjab State directing respondent no.4 - Executive Engineer, Punjab State Executive Engineer, Punjab State Power Corporation Limited, to release an electricity connection Power Corporation Limited, in Cabin electricity connection in Cabin no.98-A belonging to the petitioner belonging to the petitioner at District Court, Roop at District Court, Roopnagar.
already submitted Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has already submitted Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has a representation dated 08.03.2026, Annexure P a representation No , Annexure P-6, seeking issuance of No Objection Certificate (NOC) to respondent no.7 Objection Cert Deputy Commissioner, to respondent no.7 - Deputy Commissioner, CWP-20910-202 2026(O&M) -2- Roopnagar. T The electricity connection sought by can be released only he electricity connection sought by him can be released only after issuance of the NOC issuance of the NOC, and the representation is still representation for the purpose is still pending. At this stage, the At this stage, the petitioner will be s 7 will be satisfied in case respondent no.7 in a specified period. is directed to decide the said representation in a specified period. is directed to decide
submits Learned State counsel submits Learned State counsel aforementioned the aforementioned representation will be decided by will be decided by sing a respondent no.7, by passing a respondent no. speaking/reasoned order in accordance with law within a period of two speaking/reasoned order in accordance with law within a period of speaking/reasoned order in accordance with law within a period of months.
In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof.
Ordered accordingly. Ordered accordingly. case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the In officer concerned shall pay costs of r concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner ,000 to the petitioner. ) (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE
23.07.2026 Ad Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable Yes/No Yes/No
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: For the reasons stated, the application is allowed
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 23 Jul 2026. The bench was TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.