Vinod Kumar v. State of Haryana & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 25 Apr 2025
- Bench
- TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA
Outcome
Disposed of
petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. In view thereof, without going into the merits of the case, the PAYAL 2025.04.30 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation CWP-22605-2023 -2- before the respondents within…
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- Dr. Deepak Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant the petitioner minimum of the pay-scale extending to corresponding regular teachers of the Department along with handicap allowance, medical facilities, at least twenty casual leave, HRA, PF and other benefits.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, the petitioner will be satisfied in case he is permitted to make a fresh representation before the respondents raising the grievance as has been raised in this petition, and the same may be ordered to be decided within a specified period.
Notice of motion. Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents/State and submits that in case any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the same will be decided by respondent no.2 expeditiously.
Operative part
In view thereof, without going into the merits of the case, the PAYAL 2025.04.30 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation CWP-22605-2023 -2- before the respondents within a period of two weeks from today. In case any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be decided by respondent no.2-Director General, Elementary Education, by passing a speaking order thereupon in accordance with law, within a period of three months of receiving the representation.
In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE
25.04.2025 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable Yes/No Yes/No PAYAL 2025.04.30 15:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 25 Apr 2025. The bench was TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.