CRM-M No. 60122 of 2025 · Punjab And Haryana High Court · 2026
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Heard. Without commenting upon the merits of the case and in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the DSP, Kapurthala to look into the matter and decide the…
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE AARADHNA SAWHNEY Present: Mr. D.S. Walia, Advocate for the petitioner (through V.C). AARADHNA SAWHNEY, J (ORAL)
Prayer in the instant petition filed u/s 528 of BNSS is for issuing appropriate direction to the official respondents to take immediate legal action on petitioner’s complaint dated 06.02.2025 (P.5) against private respondent No.6, in accordance with law.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent No.6, who is residing in the same housing society, has illegally displayed Sticker of Government of India on his car (Toyota Innova). It is submitted that respondent No.6 is not a government servant, therefore, he is not entitled to affix the said Sticker. Representation by way of E-mail dated 04.02.2025 (P.5) detailing entire facts was made to the Authorities concerned but no action has been taken thereon so far.
Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Kamalpreet Bawa, DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent-State.
Heard. Without commenting upon the merits of the case and in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the DSP, Kapurthala to look into the matter and decide the representation made by way of E-mail dated 04.02.2025 (P.5) expeditiously, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of 04 weeks from today.
26.02.2026 MANOJ KUMAR 2026.03.01 03:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order ( AARADHNA SAWHNEY ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 528.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 26 Feb 2026. The bench was AARADHNA SAWHNEY.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.