Crwp No. 2589 of 2026 · Punjab And Haryana High Court · 2026
Judgment
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE AARADHNA SAWHNEY .....Respondents Present: Mr. Nitin Narula, Advocate for the petitioner. (through V.C) AARADHNA SAWHNEY , J (ORAL)
Petitioner, who unfortunately lost her husband in the year 2014 as also her son in October 2025, has filed the present petition praying therein to direct the official respondents to protect their life and liberty from the hands of private respondents.
While mentioning the backdrop of the case, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that at about 10.30 AM on 07.01.2026, private respondents abused the petitioner and her daughter-in-law and forcibly entered the house of the petitioner. She raised hue and cry. When the people including the neighbours gathered, the assailants sped away.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of the Court to copy of MLR (Annexure P.1). In so far the present petition is concerned, learned counsel for the petitioner has limited their prayer to direct the official respondents to decide representation dated 06.02.2026 annexed as Annexure P-2 moved by the petitioner.
Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Gautam Thapar, Sr. DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 and has no objection in deciding the representation filed on behalf of the petitioner.
Without commenting upon the merits of the case and in view of the MANOJ KUMAR 2026.03.10 22:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is CRWP-2589-2026 2 disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation dated
06.02.2026 (Annexure P-2) moved by the petitioner expeditiously, in accordance with law.
09.03.2026 ( AARADHNA SAWHNEY ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No MANOJ KUMAR 2026.03.10 22:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.