State of Punjab v. UDHIR SINGH
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Without commenting on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (KARAMJIT SINGH) JUDGE August 30, 2024 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: Yes/No Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2024.09.02 14:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 2 of 2
Judgment
CORAM: HO HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARA HO UDHIR SINGH ARAMJIT SINGH Present:- Mr. Mr. Vikas Gupta, Advocate for the p r the petitioner. Mr. Jatinder Singh Gill, DAG Punja Mr Punjab. SUDHIR SINGH SINGH, J. (ORAL) ***** Petition herein, inter alia, is for is Peti issuance of a writ in the nature ature of Mandamus direc directing the respondents to reserve s serve seat for the post of Sarpanch of th ch of the Gram Panchayat chayat Jawanda Kalan, Block Naushe aushera Pannuan, District Tarn Tara n Taran, for Scheduled Ca led Caste (Male) for the upcoming ele ing elections.
At the outset, learned counsel for At sel for the petitioner submits that petitioner would would be satisfied, in case, his pendin ending representation dated 01.08.202 .2024 (Annexure P-2 2) is decided by the competent petent authority, which has not be ot been adverted to by th by the respondents till date.
On the other hand, on advance ser On service of copy of petition, learn learned State counsel ap appears and opposes issuance of n ce of notice of motion. He submits grievance of the of the petitioner will be looked into into by competent authority/ responde pondent MAHAVIR SINGH 2024.09.02 14:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document of 2 1 CWP-21343-2024 (O&M) No.3 and it shall take decision either way, on pending representation dated
01.08.2024 (Annexure P-2) of the petitioner.
Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required.
Operative part
Without commenting on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority/ respondent No.3 to consider representation dated 01.08.2024 (Annexure P-2) of the petitioner and pass an appropriate reasoned order, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of 04 weeks from the date of receipt of copy/ production of this order.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (KARAMJIT SINGH) JUDGE August 30, 2024 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: Yes/No Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2024.09.02 14:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 2 of 2
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.