Crwp No. 5320 of 2025 · Punjab Jab And Haryana High Court · 2025
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE May 26, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.05.29 12:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this…
Judgment
CORAM: HON HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK HON UDHIR SINGH LOK JAIN Present:- Mr. Mr. Arpan Sabharwal, Advocate for ate for the petitioner. Ms. Arundhati Kulshreshtha, AAG P Ms. AAG Punjab. SUDHIR SINGH SINGH, J. (ORAL) ***** Present writ petition has been field Pres o the field seeking grant of parole to the petitioner, in FIR in FIR No.36 dated 07.03.2015, unde , under Section 302 of the IPC and Section 27 of the of the Arms Act, registered at Police strict olice Station Division No.2, District Jalandhar, Punjab Punjab.
In pursuance to the order dated 23.0 In a 3.05.2025 passed by this Court, a status report by w rt by way of affidavit dated 25.05.202 5.2025 has been filed by the learned State counsel, in sel, in course of hearing, and the same al of e same is taken on record. Perusal of the same shows hows that the application of the peti ’ e petitioner for grant of 04 weeks’ parole has been been rejected by the Deputy Comm Commissioner, Jalandhar vide order dated 23.05.2025
5.2025 (Annexure R-1). MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.05.29 12:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CRWP-5320-2025 (O&M)
Faced with the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to file a fresh one challenging the aforesaid order dated 23.05.2025 (Annexure R-1).
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE May 26, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.05.29 12:58 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — s. 302; Arms Act, 1959.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 26 May 2025. The bench was SUDHIR SINGH, ALOK JAIN.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.