OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-37689-2024 Date of Decision: September 25 v. STATE OF PUNJAB
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ss. 21(c), 29
Judgment
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. J.S. Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Punjab. **** SANDEEP MOUDGIL , J.(ORAL) This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking regular bail in case FIR No.139 dated 01.11.2023 under Sections 21(c), 29 of NDPS Act, 1985 registered at Police Station Basti Bawa Khel, Jalandhar Commissionerate. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the instant case. Allowed as prayed for. Dismissed as withdrawn. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE
25.09.2024 Sangeeta SANGEETA 2024.09.25 19:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Whether reasoned/speaking: Whether reportable: Yes/No Yes/No
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — ss. 21(c), 29.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 25 Sep 2024. The bench was SANDEEP MOUDGIL.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.