IN T v. State of Haryana
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
he instant petition is disposed of with
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. In view of the limited prayer made In vi r the made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the ins he instant petition is disposed of with f with the following directions; The he petitioner is to appear and su and surrender before…
Judgment
Present: Mr. Mr. Prashant Singh Chauhan, Advoc Advocate for the petitioner. *** *** MANJARI NEH NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL)
#1. The petitioner is seeking quashing The 2024 ashing of order dated 22.05.2024 (Annexure P-3) p ) passed by learned Addl. Session essions Judge, Narnaul, whereby his bail was cancelled ncelled and his bail bonds and surety - urety bonds were forfeited and non- bailable warrants arrants were issued against him in C 2018 in Complaint No.NACT/23/2018 dated 22.02.2018/ .2018/18.02.2019 .
#2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, Lear t the oner, at the outset, submits that the petitioner could n ould not appear before the Appellate pellate Court as he was ill in which regard he had had also moved an application fo ion for exemption from personal appearance. He He further submits that the petitio y to petitioner is willing and ready to appear, and surren surrender before the Appellate Court. Court. Hence, in the aforementioned facts and circums ircumstances, the petitioner be protec protected till his appearance before the Appellate Cou Court, and directions be given to th n to the Appellate Court that his bail application, whi , which he would be filing on g on his surrender, be decided expeditiously.
#3. PUSHPINDER SAINI 2024.07.03 07:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Notice of motion. Notic CRM-M-30840- -2024 -2-
#4. On asking of the Court, Mr. Ra On a , Rahul Mohan, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on tate. ice on behalf of the respondent-State.
#5. In view of the limited prayer made In vi r the made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the ins he instant petition is disposed of with f with the following directions; The he petitioner is to appear and su and surrender before the Appellate Court within 07 days from today. Cour s be day. Till then, no coercive steps be taken against the petitioner. This is his is contingent upon the petitioner paying a cost of Rs.10,000/- to be de be deposited with the District Legal Services Authority. Furthermore, the Servi ore, the petitioner is required to plant two indigenous fruit bearing trees a n the trees and two shady trees within the judicial complex in Narnaul, with th tified with the specific area to be identified by the DLSA concerned within 7 day by th 7 days from today.
#6. It is made clear that in case, the peti It is e petitioner fails to surrender before the Appellate Co Court within 07 days from today es as today and also fails to plant trees as directed hereinab reinabove, this order shall be of no av case, no avail to him, thereafter. In case, on appearance an nce and surrender, the petitioner mov l, the r moves an application for bail, the Appellate Court Court shall make earnest efforts to y, in orts to decide it expeditiously, in accordance with l with law. July 01, 2024 (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable : : Yes/No Yes/No PUSHPINDER SAINI 2024.07.03 07:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.