Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Ordered accordingly. Orde January 10, 202 Pankaj* 0, 2025 (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL AUL) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable : : Yes/No Yes/No PANKAJ KUMAR 2025.01.13 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh
Judgment
Mr. Rakesh Verma, Advocate Present: Mr. Mr. Mr. Manish Verma, Advocate for the petitioners. for t Mr. Mr. Amit Rana, Sr. DAG, Punjab for the respondent-State. for t *** *** (cid:1) MANJARI NEH NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL)
At the outset, learned counsel At ys for nsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the l of the instant petition.
Ordered accordingly. Orde January 10, 202 Pankaj* 0, 2025 (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL AUL) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable : : Yes/No Yes/No PANKAJ KUMAR 2025.01.13 10:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.