IN T v. State of Punjab
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. In view of the above, the petition In vi tition is allowed and interim order dated 26.04.2024 .2024, is made absolute subject to n in ect to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr (2) Cr.P.C. July 12, 2024 MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) (MA…
Judgment
Ms. G.K.Mann, Sr.Advocate with M Present: Ms. petitioner. petiti r the with Mr. Gursewak Singh, for the njab. Mr. Navdeep Singh, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Mr. Deepanshu Mehta, Advocate for Mr. D ate for the complainant. *** *** MANJARI NEH NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL)
The petitioner is seeking the conces The concession of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of 8 of the Cr.P.C. in case FIR No. No.0057 dated 15.09.2019 under Sections 302, 280 2, 280, 148, 149, 120-B IPC, 1860 9 of 1860 and Section 25, 27, 54, 59 of Arms Act, 1959 1959, registered at Police Station Sara Tarn Sarai Amanat Khan, District Tarn Taran.
On the last date of hearing i.e. on On t g the on 26.04.2024, while noticing the following submis submissions made by the learned ned State counsel, this Court had granted the conce concession of interim bail to the pet the petitioner and asked him to join investigation:-
Lear Learned State counsel while referring to the the reply filed today has not disputed that the pe e petitioner was indeed found innocent dur during investigation. It has also not been disput isputed that the petitioner was not named in d in the FIR in question, which was lodged by an y an eyewitness nor was there any suspici rime.
spicion raised qua his involvement in the PUSHPINDER SAINI 2024.07.13 07:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-1556-20 2024 -2-
Learned counsel for the petitioner s Lear ce of ioner submits that in compliance of order dated 26.04
26.04.2024, the petitioner has joined joined investigation and cooperated with the investiga estigating agency.
Learned State counsel, on instruction Lear ructions, does not dispute the factum of the petitione titioner having joined investigation igation and cooperated with the investigating agen g agency. He, on further instructions er is ctions, submits that the petitioner is not required for fu d for further investigation much less fo less for his custodial interrogation.
In view of the above, the petition In vi tition is allowed and interim order dated 26.04.2024 .2024, is made absolute subject to n in ect to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr (2) Cr.P.C. July 12, 2024 MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) (MA JUDGE Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable : : Yes/No Yes/No PUSHPINDER SAINI 2024.07.13 07:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.