✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court

Judgment · High Court

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

sent petition is dismissed as withdraw

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. In view of the above, the present pe In vi sent petition is dismissed as withdraw thdrawn with the aforesaid arged. resaid liberty. Rule stands discharged. September 11, 2 Atik , 2024 Wheth Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable Wheth Yes/No Yes/No (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE MOHMED…

Judgment

ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH ESH MANUJA Mr. Mazlish Khan, Advocate Present: Mr. for the petitioner. for th Mr. Shivendra Swaroop, DAG, Hary Mr. S , Haryana. **** HARKESH MAN MANUJA, J. (Oral)

#1. By way of present petition filed unde By w under Section 10 read with Section ction 12 of the Contempt tempt of Courts Act, 1971, contemp ontempt proceedings are sought to b t to be initiated against t ainst the respondent towards alleged lleged willful non-compliance of ord of order dated 18.03.2024 .2024 passed by this Court in CWP No WP No.6397 of 2024.

#2. Learned State counsel representing Lear enting the respondent submits that th that the order qua which t hich the contempt proceedings have b have been sought, stands complied wi by way of passin passing a speaking order by the Se the Secretary, Haryana Staff Selectio election Commission, Pan , Panchkula on 10.09.2024, thereby ereby rendering the present petition a tition as infructuous.

#3. In such circumstances, learned cou In su ed counsel for the petitioner seeks eeks to withdraw the pre he present petition, however, with li with liberty to challenge the aforesa foresaid order dated 10.09

10.09.2024 in accordance with law.

#4. In view of the above, the present pe In vi sent petition is dismissed as withdraw thdrawn with the aforesaid arged. resaid liberty. Rule stands discharged. September 11, 2 Atik , 2024 Wheth Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable Wheth Yes/No Yes/No (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE MOHMED ATIK 2024.09.12 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: sent petition is dismissed as withdraw

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Courts Act, 1971.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. DE P No. 1988 of 2024). ← Search more judgments