10.2024 KULDEEP SING SINGH BADWAL v. AJOY SHARMA RMA & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH ESH MANUJA Mr. Gurnoor Singh Sethi, Legal Aid Present: Mr. G for the petitioner. for th al Aid Counsel Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab. Mr. A HARKESH MAN **** MANUJA, J. (Oral)
#1. By way of present petition filed unde By w under Section 10 read with Section ction 12 of the Contempt tempt of Courts Act, 1971, contemp ontempt proceedings are sought to b t to be initiated against t ainst the respondents towards alleged lleged willful non-compliance of ord of order dated 20.10.2023 .2023 passed by this Court in CWP No WP No.17610 of 1996.
#2. Mr. Kumar Rahul, IAS, Principal Se Mr. K ipal Secretary, Department of Health ealth & Family Welfare, P lfare, Punjab has joined though video video-conferencing and informs that th that the financial benefits enefits payable to the petitioner shall r shall be released within three week e weeks from today.
#3. In view of the aforesaid undertakin In vi ertaking by the respondent(s), learne learned counsel for the pe the petitioner does not press the presen present petition.
#5. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule stand Dism stands discharged. However, in case the needful is not How is not done within the aforementione ntioned period, as per the er the undertaking, the petitioner wou er would be at liberty to seek revival o vival of contempt petition etition and in that eventuality, the er the erring/concerned officer would b ould be liable to pay a su y a sum of Rs.50,000/- as cost(s) from from his/her own pocket in favour o avour of the petitioner tow er towards litigation expenses, imm , immediately i.e. on the first date o date of listing of revival a vival application. October 01, 202 Atik , 2024 Wheth Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable Wheth Yes/No Yes/No (HARKESH MANUJA) (HA JUDGE MOHMED ATIK 2024.10.03 15:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.