Judgment · High Court

ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH ESH MANUJA Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate Present: Mr. for the petitioners. for th Ms. R Ms. Ravinder Kaur Manaise, Advoca for the respondents. for th dvocate HARKESH MAN MANUJA, J. (Oral) ****

#1. By way of present petition filed unde By w under Section 10 read with Section ction 12 of the Contempt tempt of Courts Act, 1971, contemp ontempt proceedings are sought to b t to be initiated against t ainst the respondents on account of w willful disobedience of order date er dated

26.10.2010 passe passed by this Court in CR No.2033 o 2033 of 2010.

#2. Short reply by way of affidavit of Sh Shor t of Sh. Shiv Singh/respondent No.1 ha o.1 has been filed in Cour n Court, which is taken on record.

#3. Learned counsel representing the Lear g the respondents submits that that in pursuance of the of the order dated 26.10.2010, the r the respondents shall not disturb th b the possession of the of the petitioner.

#4. In such circumstances, learned cou In su d counsel for the petitioner wishes ishes to withdraw the pre he present petition, however, with lib ith liberty to seek revival, in case an ase any cause survives.

#5. In view of the above, the present pe In vi sent petition is dismissed as withdraw thdrawn with the aforesaid resaid liberty.

#6. Rule ule stands discharged. August 22, 202 Atik , 2024 (HARKESH MANUJA) (HA JUDGE Whe Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable Whe Yes/N Yes/No Yes/No Yes/N MOHMED ATIK 2024.08.23 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment