✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 24 Feb 2024

State of Punjab v. UDHIR SINGH

Cwp No. 15510 of 2024SUDHIR SINGH, KARAMJIT SINGH2 min read

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Without commenting on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of

Key paragraphs

  • Para 66. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (KARAMJIT SINGH) JUDGE July 24, 2024 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: Yes/No Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2024.07.26 12:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment 2 of 2

Judgment

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHI CORAM: HO HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARA HO UDHIR SINGH ARAMJIT SINGH Present:- Mr. Mr. Kulbir Singh Sekhon, Advocate vocate for the petitioners. Mr. Harkanwar Jeet Singh, AAG Pu Mr. AG Punjab. SUDHIR SINGH SINGH, J. (ORAL) ***** Petition herein, inter alia, is for is Peti issuance of a writ in the nature ature of Mandamus direc directing the respondents to shift v shift votes of the petitioners and the family members mbers into those wards where their res eir respective houses are geographical phically situated by makin making correction in the voter list for list for the year 2023 (Annexure P-2) ).

2.

At the outset, learned counsel for At t el for the petitioners submits that petitioners woul would be satisfied, in case, thei their pending representation dat

24.02.2024 (Ann (Annexure P-4) is decided by the co concerned authority, which has n has not been adverted to to by the respondents till date.

3.

On the other hand, on advance ser On service of copy of petition, learn learned State counsel ap appears and opposes issuance of n ce of notice of motion. He submits grievance of the of the petitioners will be looked into into by concerned authority and it sha MAHAVIR SINGH 2024.07.26 12:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment of 2 1 CWP-15510-2024 (O&M) take decision either way, on pending representation dated 24.02.2024 (Annexure P-4) of the petitioners.

4.

Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required.

Operative part

5.

Without commenting on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned authority to consider representation dated

24.02.2024 (Annexure P-4) of the petitioners and pass an appropriate reasoned order, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of 04 weeks from the date of receipt of copy/ production of this order.

6.

Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (KARAMJIT SINGH) JUDGE July 24, 2024 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: Yes/No Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2024.07.26 12:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment 2 of 2

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Without commenting on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of

Which court decided this case, and when?

Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 24 Feb 2024. The bench was SUDHIR SINGH, KARAMJIT SINGH.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Cwp No. 15510 of 2024). ← Search more judgments