✦ Punjab & Haryana High Court · 18 May 2026

TARANJIT SINGH v. (O&M)

CRM-M No. 20167 of 2026MANDEEP PANNU

Judgment

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Ms. Anmol Thakur, Advocate for Present: Ms. Anmol Thakur, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sahil Chowdhary, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Sahil Chowdhary, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Sahil Chowdhary, AAG, Punjab. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for After arguing for some ti submits me, learned counsel for petitioner submits that she does not want to pursue the he does not want to pursue the present petition and the same be dismissed present petition and the same be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty file fresh one with better particulars. with liberty to file fresh one with better particulars. Ordered accordingly. Ordered accordingly. ( (MANDEEP PANNU) JUDGE

18.05.2026 himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No HIMANSHU 2026.05.18 17:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CRM-M No. 20167 of 2026). ← Search more judgments