NARESH RANI & Ors. v. CHANDER MOHAN BHATIA & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Order date
- 19 Sep 2025
- Bench
- MANDEEP PANNU
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for want of
Judgment
Operative part
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present:- None. ***** MANDEEP PANNU, J. (Oral) The present appeal relates to the fire incident that occurred in the year 2012. As per the office noting, notice issued to the counsel for the appellants was returned with a report stating that the name of Mr. Kamna Kumar Jain was not found in the Bar Directory. Despite repeated calls, none has appeared on behalf of the appellants. Hence, it seems that the appellants are not interested in pursuing the present appeal any further. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. All pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly.
19.09.2025 Anu (MANDEEP PANNU) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable : : Yes/No Yes/No ANU 2025.09.19 14:16 I am the author of this document Chandigarh
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for want of
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 19 Sep 2025. The bench was MANDEEP PANNU.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.