GURPREET SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of
Provisions considered
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 s. 482
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ss. 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 118(2), 190, 191(3), 324(4), 333
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 326, 427, 452
Judgment
JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU CORAM: HON'BLE MS. Mr. K.S. Bal, Advocate for the petitioner. Present: Mr. K.S. Bal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Bal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.S. Wadhwa, DAG, Punjab. Mr. H.S. Wadhwa, DAG, Punjab. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) has been filed for The instant petition under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 has been filed for The instant petition under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 The instant petition under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No. grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in , under FIR No. 205, dated 10.12.2025, under 333, 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 117(2), 324(4), 191(3) and 190 of the BNS, 2023 Sections 333, 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 117(2), 324(4), 191(3) and 190 of the BNS, 2023 333, 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 117(2), 324(4), 191(3) and 190 of the BNS, 2023 333, 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 117(2), 324(4), 191(3) and 190 of the BNS, 2023 (corresponding to Sections 452, 323, 324, 326, 325, 427, 148 and 149 of the IPC), (corresponding to Sections 452, 323, 324, 326, 325, 427, 148 and 149 of the IPC), (corresponding to Sections 452, 323, 324, 326, 325, 427, 148 and 149 of the IPC), (corresponding to Sections 452, 323, 324, 326, 325, 427, 148 and 149 of the IPC), ritsar. registered at Police Station Rajasansi, District Amritsar. registered at Police Station This Court vide order dated 06.04.2026 This Court v while issuing notice of motion, 06.04.2026, while issuing notice of motion, granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioner, subject to his joining the granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioner, subject to his joining the granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioner, subject to his joining the granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioner, subject to his joining the investigation.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in pursuance to the order Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in pursuance to the order Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in pursuance to the order Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in pursuance to the order , the petitioner has joined the investigation. dated 06.04.2026, the petitioner has joined the investigation. , the petitioner has joined the investigation. Learned State counsel submits that he does not controvert the said fact Learned State counsel submits that he does not controvert the said fact Learned State counsel submits that he does not controvert the said fact Learned State counsel submits that he does not controvert the said fact tion of the petitioner is not required. and further submits that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. and further submits that custodial interroga In view of the above, the order dated 06.04 In view of the above, the order dated
Operative part
06.04.2026 is made absolute. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of.
23.04.2026 himanshu ( (MANDEEP PANNU) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No HIMANSHU 2026.04.23 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 482; Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — ss. 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 118(2), 190, 191(3), 324(4), 333; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 148, 149, 323, 324, 325, 326, 427, 452.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 23 Apr 2026. The bench was MANDEEP PANNU.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.