08.2024 SAVITA JAIN v. T L SATYAPRA PRAKASH
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In view of the above, learned cou In v ed counsel for the petitioner seeks eeks to withdrawn the p the present petition, however with with liberty to avail his remedies edies in accordance with l with law. Dismissed as withdrawn with the Dism…
Judgment
ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH ESH MANUJA Mr. Adarsh Jain, Advocate Present: Mr. A for the petitioner. for th vocate Mr. Harmanjot Singh Gill, Advocate Mr. H or the respondent. for th **** MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MAN
#1. By way of present petition filed unde By w under Section 10 read with Section ction 12 of the Contempt tempt of Courts Act, 1971, contemp ontempt proceedings are sought to b t to be initiated against ainst the respondent on account of unt of non-compliance of order date r dated
25.05.2023 passe passed by this Court in CWP No.114 11440 of 2023, whereby responde pondent No.2 was directe directed to consider and decide the e the representation submitted by th by the petitioner by way y way of passing a speaking order.
#2. Learned counsel representing the re Lear the respondent submits that the ord e order qua which the con contempt proceedings are sought, , has been complied with by way o way of passing a speakin peaking order dated 20.08.2024, there thereby rendering the present petitio petition as infructuous.
#3. In view of the above, learned cou In v ed counsel for the petitioner seeks eeks to withdrawn the p the present petition, however with with liberty to avail his remedies edies in accordance with l with law. Dismissed as withdrawn with the Dism th the aforesaid liberty. Rule stand stands
#4. discharged. August 20, 202 Atik , 2024 (HARKESH MANUJA) (HA JUDGE Whe Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable Whe Yes/N Yes/No Yes/No Yes/N MOHMED ATIK 2024.08.22 10:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.