Amar Singh v. State of Punjab
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI Present : Mr. Ramesh Goyat, Advocate. K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL) As per allegations, 885 gms of Heroine was recovered from the petitioner. The quantity recovered is commercial in nature. In view of Section 37 of the N.D.P.S Act, no ground for grant of regular bail is made out. Dismissed. OCTOBER 18, 2012 shalini (K. C. PURI) JUDGE
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — s. 37.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Punjab & Haryana High Court, on 18 Oct 2012. The bench was K C PURI.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status.
← Search more judgments