Bhool Chand v. State of Haryana
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 10 Dec 2010
- Bench
- K C PURI
Judgment
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI Present : Mr. Sanjay Vashisth, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ajay Gulati, DAG, Haryana. K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Ram Parkash, has stated at the bar that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no more required for further investigation. In view of the above, the order dated 01.11.2010 is hereby made absolute. Disposed of. DECEMBER 10, 2010 shalini (K. C. PURI) JUDGE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status.
← Search more judgments