Pooja Jain v. State of U.T., Chandigarh
Judgment
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI Present : Mr. Bipan Ghai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ravinder Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sukant Gupta, Advocate, Standing counsel for U.T., Chandigarh. Mr. Karanvir Singh Khehar, Advocate, for the complainant. K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL) Since the FIR in question has been quashed vide Crl. Misc. No. M-23554 of 2012 titled as, “Pooja Jain vs. State of U.T., Chandigarh and another”, the present petition has become infructuous. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. AUGUST 27, 2012 shalini (K. C. PURI) JUDGE
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Punjab & Haryana High Court or eCourts case status.
← Search more judgments