COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA-1646-2000 (O&M) (O&M) February 09 v. HARI RAM.” STATE OF HARYANA VS. HARI RAM.” Pending application(s)
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RFA-1646-2000 (O&M) (O&M) February 09, 2026 Date of Decision: February 09, 2026 Date of Decision: STATE OF HARYANA STATE OF HARYANA RAM KAWAR Versus ........Appellant ........Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana. landowner(s). None for respondent(s)-landowner(s). None for respondent(s) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) HARKESH MANUJA **** For detailed order, see order of even date passed in RFA- For detailed order, see order of even date passed in For detailed order, see order of even date passed in - 768-2000 titled as “ titled as “STATE OF HARYANA VS. HARI RAM.” STATE OF HARYANA VS. HARI RAM.” Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
09.02.2026 Tejwinder (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable Yes/No Yes/No TEJWINDER SINGH 2026.02.19 17:37 I agree to specified portions of this document
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.