GARH ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-3743-2025 (O&M Date of decision: February 10 & Ors. v. Petition etitioner ….Responden ondents
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
Without commenting on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE February 10, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: Yes/No Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.02.11 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment 2 of 2
Judgment
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHI CORAM: HO HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKH HO UDHIR SINGH SUKHVINDER KAUR Present:- Mr. Mr. Mohammad Arshad, Advocate f ocate for the petitioner. Mr. Samarth Sagar, Additional AG H Mr. l AG Haryana. SUDHIR SINGH SINGH, J. (ORAL) ***** Petition herein, inter alia, is for is Peti issuance of a writ in the nature ature of Mandamus direc directing the respondents to immedi mediately add petitioner’s name in t e in the Voter List of Wa of Ward No.13, Municipal Committee mittee, Tauru.
At the outset, learned counsel for th At t for the petitioner submits that petition etitioner would be satis satisfied, in case, her pending ding representation dated 03.01.202 .01.2025 (Annexure P-6) ) is decided by respondent No.4/ No.4/concerned authority, which has n has not been adverted to to by the respondents till date.
On the other hand, on advance ser On service of copy of petition, learn learned State counsel ap appears and opposes issuance of n ce of notice of motion. He submits grievance of the of the petitioner will be looked int ed into by respondent No.4/concern ncerned authority and it it shall take decision either way, r way, on pending representation date n dated MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.02.11 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment of 2 1 CWP-3743-2025 (O&M)
03.01.2025 (Annexure P-6) of the petitioner. He ensures that the decision will be taken at the earliest.
Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required.
Operative part
Without commenting on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.4/concerned authority to consider pending representation dated 03.01.2025 (Annexure P-6) of the petitioner and pass an appropriate reasoned order, in accordance with law, at the earliest, from the date of receipt of copy/ production of this order.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE February 10, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: Yes/No Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.02.11 16:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment 2 of 2
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.