11.2024 Date o m Dhir Neelam Dhir v. State of Punj f Punjab & Ors.

M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH NIDHI GUPTA Present: - Mr. Hitesh Verma, Advocate fo cate for the applicant. Ms. Guramrit Kaur, DAG, Punj , Punjab. Mr. Yogesh Goel, Advocate for ate for respondents No. 2 to 5. NIDHI GUP I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) By way of filing the insta instant Criminal Miscellaneous Application, ation, the applicant seeks special lea ial leave to file appeal against the judgment da ent dated 31.03.2017, passed by the l e Ist y the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Ludha Ludhaina, acquitting respondents No 113 ts No. 2 to 5, in case FIR No. 113 dated 30.05.

30.05.2006 registered under Sections 4 tions 406, 498A, 323, 324, 506 and 149 IPC at P C at Police Station Division No. 6, Lu . 6, Ludhiana. On the last date of hearing i.e. ng i.e. 21.08.2024, following order was passed b assed by this Court:- “Challenge in the pre judgment of acquittal dated 31 85/1/28.07.2006 arising out of F registered under Sections 406 IPC at Police Station Division the accused persons have been Power of Attorney filed o to 5 in Court today is taken on r Learned counsel for res that present appeal is per se n present application is to the d 31.03.2017 passed in Case No. o. 06 of FIR No. 113 dated 30.05.2006 49 406, 498-A, 323, 324, 506, 149 sion No. 6, Ludhiana, whereby all een acquitted. . 2 led on behalf of respondents No. 2 on record. respondents No. 2 to 5 submits , a se not maintainable. Moreover, a RISHU KATARIA 2024.11.12 13:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CRM-A-233 2338-MA-2017 -2- a compromise has been arrived ved at between the parties and a 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act joint petition under Section 13 had been filed, which was allow allowed vide judgment and decree 20 dated 11.02.2021 passed in C in Case No. 2245 of 07.03.2020 Neelam Gulati and Aman Dhir’ titled as ‘Neelam Dhir @ Nee Judge, Family Court, District learned Principal Judg has been handed over in Court Ludhiana. A copy thereof has ord. today which is taken on record. sel for the applicant submits that Learned proxy counsel f this regard and prays for short he has no instructions in this accommodation. Adjourned to 06.11.2024

024.” Learned counsel appearing fo ing for the applicant submits that even today a oday also he has no instructions from s from the applicant in the present case. Howev owever, learned counsel for the appli e applicant is unable to deny the fact that vide ju ide judgment and decree dated 11.0 y of d 11.02.2021, divorce by way of mutual cons l consent has been granted to the ap the applicant-wife and respondent No. 2-husba husband by virtue of Section 13-B Act, B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, where wherein all disputes stand settled be led between the parties; and it was undertaken b aken by the applicant that she shall w shall withdraw the present Criminal Miscellaneou llaneous Application. Even the settlem settlement amount of Rs.17,00,000/- paid. stands paid. As such, in view of the abov above admitted facts, the present Criminal Mi nal Miscellaneous Application stands d tands disposed of, accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, s any, shall also stand disposed of. 2024

06.11.2024 ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned ned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2024.11.12 13:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.