✦ Jharkhand High Court

No. 206 of 2024 Birendra Agarwal @ Modi @ Birendra A. Modi v. Punam Kumari @ Punam Devi

SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, RAJESH KUMAR

Case at a glance

Bench
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, RAJESH KUMAR
Neutral citation
2025:JHHC:15186-DB

Outcome

Withdrawn

Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed as withdrawn and

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 55. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of as such. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Sudhir

Judgment

First Appeal No. 206 of 2024 ----- Birendra Agarwal @ Modi @ Birendra A. Modi, s/o Punichand Modi, aged about 30 years, Resident of Village-Punsia, PO-Malhara, PS- Appellant Rikhiya, Dist-Deoghar ....... … Versus Punam Kumari @ Punam Devi W/o Birendra Agarwal, D/o Parmeshwar Modi resident of Village-Punsia, PO-Malhara, PS-Rikhiya, Dist.- Deoghar, presently residing at Village-Baijnathpur, PO & PS-Deoghar, District-Deoghar … … Respondent ------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ------- For the Appellant : Mr. Lakhan Chandra Roy, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. Sudhansu Kumar Deo, Adv. Order No.5/Dated: 12th June, 2025 ------

1.

Heard Mr. Lakhan Chandra Roy, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr. Sudhansu Kumar Deo, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

2.

The learned counsel appearing for the parties have jointly submitted that an application under section 13 B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 has been filed by the parties before the competent Court of jurisdiction.

3.

Mr. Lakhan Chandra Roy, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant has submitted that in view of the aforesaid fact, the appellant does not want to press the instant appeal and, as such, he seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the same.

4.

Leave, as prayed for, is granted.

Operative part

5.

Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of as such. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Sudhir

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed as withdrawn and

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Jharkhand High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments